in legal context, after you've defended yourself lethaly, i've heard the angle that to have modified your stock pistol can be used against you in court...along the lines of "he was preoccupied with his firearm & was anxious to use it". anyone have thoughts on that? is it accurate? if so, to what degree? the grip i put on my xm is nice & makes it much more grippable...is that incriminating? what about lasers? tactical lights? that perfect iwb hoster? if i had a spyderco on me in a kydex sheath & a mercharness when i shot a bg? there are a lot of mods that are useful & make a firearm & other weapons more potent & deployable & isn't that the point? lethality & accesability? it is a weird concept to me, but as a court play, where those in sway are not necessarily in the same train of thought of edcers, what's the real risk?